
The sun rose over a peaceful Toytown as Dennis sleepily scratched at a flea and yawned. He heard some-one in the kitchen and cautiously padded along the hall.








"Larry" , said Dennis The Dachshund, "The longest day of the year has come and gone and you are still poring over the papers in that dreadful Tesco Bag. What is worrying you?"

So, Happy Christmas to all my 'fellow passengers' to the grave!






I noticed on Saturday that the Victoria Crossroads ( a now much improved junction thanks to KCC) may have to be re-named. It would appear that The Queen Victoria is now an 'exciting new business opportunity in the Inn trade'. Some might recognise how boarded up shops were given a similar description in Margate earlier this year.
I was delighted in November when wheeled bins arrived at the Biggles terraced property and that the 'Heebies' planted last year in expectation of this event would screen them, as was the intention. I was sent a lovely pack of information from TDC with the title "LIFTING THE LID on your new service."
You can look at the whole planning application on www.ukplanning.com under F/TH/08/1393.
For its size , there is no doubt that Westgate does Christmas in style that shames Northdown Road, in Cliftonville; from the Christmas Street Party on Saturday 6th December to the lights!
The news today that Goldman Sachs intends to pay out £1.67 billion in bonuses to its staff has me incensed. This 'Bank' has been bailed out by the US Taxpayer and yet intends to pay out bonuses at an average per employee of £55,000.
A reader has sent me this picture, allegedly taken in the corridor outside 'Our Leader's ' Office at TDC earlier today. I cannot believe that staff and visitors are now required to take their shoes off, just in case they express disgust with his public conduct, in the Iraqi fashion!
On the 9th October, at The TDC Council Meeting to consider the China Gateway Planning Application for 'Phase 1' on Manston Business Park, Cllr Poole asked the Chair to consult The Monitoring Officer on a 'point of order' as follows:"Would the monitoring officer please rule on the acceptance by Cabinet of a donation by the developer (CGP).......". Cllr Poole was making reference to the £12,500 'sponsorship donation made by CGP to TDC's 'Big Event' whilst its Planning Application was 'live' and under consideration by TDC.
Cllr Poole got short shrift from The Chair but the Monitoring Officer later made a reply. (Cllr Poole was clearly in order to raise it!). The reply, was as follows:
"...that was a payment received by The Council, not by The Cabinet and cannot create a personal interest by any member of the Council........ it cannot impugne the integrity and quality of the proceedings..".
I find this 'ruling' interesting. Whilst I agree, that no member could have a 'personal' interest, I have to beg to differ about it not affecting the integrity of the proceedings. Is there not a principle that is being carefully avoided by The Monitoring Officer, GOSE and now the Under Secretay of State, Mr Sadiq Khan?
Having seen the reply from GOSE to CPRE and many individuals asking for The Secreatary of State to 'call-in' the Planning Application, I am convinced that GOSE had 'pre-determined' such requests and even if it had been presented with clear evidence that Martians were beginning their invasion of Earth through Phase 1, would have replied in exactly the same way!
It has come to my attention that despite a constituent asking for his MP to request a reply from The Secretary of State that actually dealt with the issues brought to her attention, all the MP got was the standard letter to CPRE dated 17 Oct declining to call it in but at least dealt with by The Under Secretary of State! The person concerned, e-mailed Sadiq Khan with a letter attached, at the beginning of November asking for an answer. The 'system' avoids embarrassing questions of principle by not answering them and ignoring them. Having received no reply, he has since sent a letter to Sadiq Khan and I copy it below:
Sadiq Khan MP
Parliamentary Under Secretary of State
Department for Communities and Local Government
Eland House
Bressenden Place
London SW1E 5DU 12th December 2008
Dear Mr Khan,
THANET DISTRICT COUNCIL PLANNING APPLICATION F/TH/08/0400
Roger Gale my Member of Parliament kindly copied your reply to him of 29 Oct 2008 to me.
I e-mailed you on the 7th November with effectively the contents of this letter attached as a letter and have not had the courtesy of a reply.
I am surprised that quite clearly you have not grasped the issue here.
Could you please do me the simple courtesy of explaining or answering these two simple points:
1. How can GOSE consider IN ADVANCE a request that they had yet to receive from me for The Secretary of State to call an application in and then without reference to the points drawn to their attention in that letter, send me a standard reply addressed to CPRE? Is this not pre-determination in its most derisory form?
2. Could you please tell me exactly what amount of money donated to and accepted by a Council from a developer whilst that Council is considering its application would warrant concern by your Department that the planning process had been compromised and therefore warrant The Secretary of State ‘calling–in’ the application? Would it be £5, £50,000 £500,000 or £5,000,000?
I await your reply with interest.
Yours sincerely,
XXXX
How do you rate his chances of getting a reply?
This murky scene sums up the situation in just a few watering holes in Thanet tonight with Christmas less than two weeks away. The Swan in Westgate was the quietest I have seen it, ever; The Nottingham Castle closed at 10pm with just 6 customers since 4pm and The Wig & Pen was shut in Margate Old Town as Bertie was driven home 45 minutes ago.
Yesterday's Independent was looking at the Chinese Economy and its response to the Global economic downturn. Whilst its export markets have shrunk, its internal market is huge as are its foreign currency reserves. If the 'pain' can take place without internal turmoil, it will be set for business as usual in due course.In addition, an Inspector from Kent Highways noted that some of the posts are less than 500mm from the edge of the carriageway and as such are likely to have been erected on Highways land!
CGP has given assurances that Kent Highways comments will be acted on quickly and that presumably they will follow guidance from Kent Highways to " ensure that your new fence is a minimum of 1m from the edge of the carriageway to alleviate any doubt that the fence is erected on Highway's land."
Bertie is a simple sort of chap and wonders in view of this advice, why CGP does not simply accept that the fence already marking their land is about 1m away from the 'edge of the carriageway' and bin their ideas to re-fence their boundary along the B 2190 as they remove the stakes and barbed wire erected last Friday. Is it really worth all the expense it will cost to move the existing boundary fence forward a few millimetres? Perhaps that 'contractor' who hopefully has now received his cheque from the previous owners of the land, was an experienced 'fencer' after all and made sure that the existing fence was 1m away from the edge of the carriageway!
It seems to Bertie that 'common-sense' should prevail in fencing matters rather than 'PR Company' prepared statements to extract oneself from a self inflicted predicament!
I wonder how many households in Thanet, where income is gained by working at one of our four High Street stores owned by Woolworths ,would agree with Mr Brown's 'Freudian slip' in The Commons today? Quite frankly, we have to accept that Woolies was in trouble before the present recession and its expiry was just a question of time. Stock clearance, redundancy and closure are now the order of the day. The struggling High Streets in Margate, Cliftonville, Broadstairs and Ramsgate now await a further body blow.
Many thanks to Dickie, as he sups hot toddies (made with single malts as I am sure he would not have a blended bottle in the Eastcliff Mansion) and recovers from his 'cod', for assisting me in putting some links in 'Strife'.
The eagle eyed will spot that the residents of Pouces Cottages are about to be stuck between a 'rock and a hard place'. If they can fight off Phases 2 and 3 of Gateway, they then have the problem of a main road (possibly dualled) at the end of their gardens instead of being surrounded by industrial sheds.
You can go and pay £12 on Thursday for breakfast at Frank's gaff in Pegwell and listen to Rob Prince of CGP tell you about business opportunities that could be in the pipe-line if Phases 2 and 3 of 'China Gateway' get off the ground ( from IT , vending machines, signage and so much more?) or you might better spend your time in Ramsgate on Friday 12th at St George's Hall (free entrance) listening to Caroline Lucas , Green MEP for the South East, John Stewart of Airport Watch and Dr Hilary Newport, Director of CPRE Kent.

I have held the view that Kent International Airport and its eventual success as an airport will be good news for Thanet. That said, my eardrums were blasted the other day as I was filling up with diesel at the garage on The Canterbury Road East and I looked up and counted the rivets on a plane going into land and I realised at first hand what the Residents of Ramsgate and ECR have to put up with. I therefore make no apology for showing you this letter that Steve Higgins has asked me to put up.
Item 7 on tonight's Cabinet Meeting includes consideration of the report By Democratic Services and Scrutiny on the petition "Say No to The Sale of Northdown House" signed by 1898 fellow citizens and presented to Council on 24 July. Having sought legal advice, TDC accepts usage or occupancy is subject to Covenant and it seems that this can be 'passed on' to a new occupier. (That's Bertie's reading of Paragraph 3.2.3 of Item 7 on The Agenda). Here it is in TDC gobbledygook and see if you can make sense of it.
Mole minor reports that TDC Cabinet Meeting this Thursday 4th December, will be discussing the Annual Monitoring Report (AMR) and changing the Local Development Scheme. It would seem that GOSE has indicated it would support changes to employment land being re-designated for housing. So the moves to put 700 houses on Eurokent seem to be going nicely and that re-designation for prime agricultural land for CGPs Phases 2 and 3 Gateway will presumably follow in due course. It does seem odd that Minster Parish Council Minutes last month refer to KCC stating that Eurokent proposals (lots of houses) could " see the possible allocation of £3,000 to all Parish Councils in Kent". Anyone interested in how Thanet is to be over-developed in the next few years should attend The Cabinet Meeting on Thursday.